Akademy/2024/CI CD BoF
Appearance
Akademy 2024 CI/CD BoF Notes
- Release process as CI jobs: so far failed on the need for special permissions for uploads or signing
- some parts nowadays doable via the Notary Service
- we currently have no ways for the CI system to push changes to Git, which is needed here for version bumps and creating release notes pages
- signing and uploading tarballs should be implementable with the Notary Service
- policy question on whether we trust a machine signature more or less than a key under human control
- Example projects and how to run tests - see e.g. KCalc
- performance measurements of tests for noticing regressions
- results aren't comparable with runs on other machines (different hardware, different software config with ASAN, coverage, full debug etc)
- comparing to previous runs can work though, we have no infrastructure for retain and compare such results though
- clang-format version pinning just landed, which might help with the stability of formatting CI jobs
- Appium tests stability on the CI: seems to vary greatly between repos
- Not working for Neochat or Kate on CI (but locally)
- For Itinerary and KCalc they work perfectly fine
- We need better/more documentation for others to help with CI maintenance or CI self-service, same for .craft.ini and .craftignore
- CI for Craft
- https://invent.kde.org/sysadmin/ci-utilities/-/merge_requests/369
- Ingo has a prototype
- two issues here: test a new or changed blueprint builds on all platforms; test whether dependent stuff breaks
- the former can be fixed with Ingo's work, the latter with a production branch
- how to structure caches for two branches? branch models?
- how long to keep Craft blueprint versions around? - stable branch would help with users needing old blueprint versions as well
- Gear release three branch problem
- the magic branch stuff has a two branch assumption hardcoded basically