Jump to content

Get Involved/Quality/Akademy2012BoF: Difference between revisions

From KDE Community Wiki
D ed (talk | contribs)
Initial Import from text
 
D ed (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
KDE Quality Team BOF
KDE Quality Team BOF


==Review of 4.9 testing==


Review
* Was really only a trial, went well.
- Was really only a trial, went well.
* Definitely better than if we hadn't done anything
- Definitely better than if we hadn't done anything
* Regression email to Plasma worked well (though should probably stop now)
- Regression email to Plasma worked well (though should probably stop now)
* We need to scale up what we're doing into more areas, without doing a worse job on it  
- We need to scale up what we're doing into more areas, without doing a worse job on it  


Improving User Testing
==Improving User Testing==
- The checklists in Plasma worked well, found (and fixed) many issues.
* The checklists in Plasma worked well, found (and fixed) many issues.
- This needs to be extended to everything
* This needs to be extended to everything
- AG, Copy Ubuntu's "checkboxes" (TODO find a link)
* AG, Copy Ubuntu's "checkboxes" (TODO find a link)
- It tells the user "do this [worked, broken, skip]"
* It tells the user "do this [worked, broken, skip]"
- Then submits a report
* Then submits a report
- Don't be too specific in what to check, that way the user can spot bugs that are hard for automated testing to find.  
* Don't be too specific in what to check, that way the user can spot bugs that are hard for automated testing to find.  
- Less work to write than automated tests,  
* Less work to write than automated tests, and more flexible.


EBN
==EBN==
- too many false positives / minor issues hide the big issues
* too many false positives / minor issues hide the big issues
- Aleix Poi apparently has a static analyser written for a thesis we could look at.
* Aleix Poi apparently has a static analyser written for a thesis we could look at.


Jenkins:
==Jenkins==
- Needs to be more open
* Needs to be more open
- We need examples/docs
* We need examples/docs. What it does + how to use it.
- What it does + how to use it.




Valgrind (memcheck):
==Valgrind (memcheck)==
- This is a useful test, however it's quite tricky to use/analyse, so reports should only be done by developers testing (to identify which lib a leak is in for example)
* This is a useful test, however it's quite tricky to use/analyse, so reports should only be done by developers testing (to identify which lib a leak is in for example)
- Someone should write a wiki page on how to memcheck, filter out nonsense that we can't fix.
* Someone should write a wiki page on how to memcheck, filter out nonsense that we can't fix.
- Then submit leaks as bug reports with valgrind backtraces
* Then submit leaks as bug reports with valgrind backtraces


Improving Tester numbers:
==Improving Tester numbers==
- RG to make VirtualBox images of ProjectNeon. Has some issues, hopefully can all be fixed before 4.10
* RG to make VirtualBox images of ProjectNeon. Has some issues, hopefully can all be fixed before 4.10


Release numbers:
==Release numbers==
- AG suggested modifying the release numbers to something more easier.
* AG suggested modifying the release numbers to something more easier.
  4.9.71 = alpha1
**  4.9.71 = alpha1
  4.9.72 = alpha2
**  4.9.72 = alpha2
  4.9.73 = alpha3
**  4.9.73 = alpha3
  4.9.81 = beta1
**  4.9.81 = beta1
  4.9.82 = beta2
**  4.9.82 = beta2
  4.9.91 = RC1
**  4.9.91 = RC1
  4.9.92 = RC2
**  4.9.92 = RC2
   
   
- suggest changing for 4.10
* suggest changing for 4.10


Other:
==Other==
- everyone should listen to Jeroen on bugzilla management.
* everyone should listen to Jeroen on bugzilla management.


Extra Mile:
==Extra Mile==
[Insert Link to AG bof here]
* [Insert Link to AG bof here]
Was agreed to put it under the banner of "KDE Quality" and do the discussions/planning on our mailing list/IRC channel. If you have any objections to that, please raise them now.
* Was agreed to put it under the banner of "KDE Quality" and do the discussions/planning on our mailing list/IRC channel. If you have any objections to that, please raise them now.


Actions:
==Actions==
- Write an email to the kde-release-team with the proposed release numbers
* Write an email to the kde-release-team with the proposed release numbers
- Write a tool for showing "UI test steps"
* Write a tool for showing "UI test steps"
- Write some test examples (suggest AG does gwenview, DE to do KTP, then we can encourage users to write tests for the others)
* Write some test examples (suggest AG does gwenview, DE to do KTP, then we can encourage users to write tests for the others)
- Sort out Jenkins
* Sort out Jenkins
- find a way to highlight the important issues in EBN
* find a way to highlight the important issues in EBN
- Tools page in wiki needs splitting into debuggers/profilers (such as gammaray) and actual testing tools
* Tools page in wiki needs splitting into debuggers/profilers (such as gammaray) and actual testing tools

Revision as of 11:01, 12 July 2012

KDE Quality Team BOF

Review of 4.9 testing

  • Was really only a trial, went well.
  • Definitely better than if we hadn't done anything
  • Regression email to Plasma worked well (though should probably stop now)
  • We need to scale up what we're doing into more areas, without doing a worse job on it

Improving User Testing

  • The checklists in Plasma worked well, found (and fixed) many issues.
  • This needs to be extended to everything
  • AG, Copy Ubuntu's "checkboxes" (TODO find a link)
  • It tells the user "do this [worked, broken, skip]"
  • Then submits a report
  • Don't be too specific in what to check, that way the user can spot bugs that are hard for automated testing to find.
  • Less work to write than automated tests, and more flexible.

EBN

  • too many false positives / minor issues hide the big issues
  • Aleix Poi apparently has a static analyser written for a thesis we could look at.

Jenkins

  • Needs to be more open
  • We need examples/docs. What it does + how to use it.


Valgrind (memcheck)

  • This is a useful test, however it's quite tricky to use/analyse, so reports should only be done by developers testing (to identify which lib a leak is in for example)
  • Someone should write a wiki page on how to memcheck, filter out nonsense that we can't fix.
  • Then submit leaks as bug reports with valgrind backtraces

Improving Tester numbers

  • RG to make VirtualBox images of ProjectNeon. Has some issues, hopefully can all be fixed before 4.10

Release numbers

  • AG suggested modifying the release numbers to something more easier.
    • 4.9.71 = alpha1
    • 4.9.72 = alpha2
    • 4.9.73 = alpha3
    • 4.9.81 = beta1
    • 4.9.82 = beta2
    • 4.9.91 = RC1
    • 4.9.92 = RC2
  • suggest changing for 4.10

Other

  • everyone should listen to Jeroen on bugzilla management.

Extra Mile

  • [Insert Link to AG bof here]
  • Was agreed to put it under the banner of "KDE Quality" and do the discussions/planning on our mailing list/IRC channel. If you have any objections to that, please raise them now.

Actions

  • Write an email to the kde-release-team with the proposed release numbers
  • Write a tool for showing "UI test steps"
  • Write some test examples (suggest AG does gwenview, DE to do KTP, then we can encourage users to write tests for the others)
  • Sort out Jenkins
  • find a way to highlight the important issues in EBN
  • Tools page in wiki needs splitting into debuggers/profilers (such as gammaray) and actual testing tools