Digikam/GSoC2010/NonDestructiveEditing: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Working wiki for digiKam NonDestructiveEditing GSoC 2010 project |
No edit summary |
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
*Always store the latest version (the current) in a normal file - good for thumbnailing and editing with external apps like Gimp | *Always store the latest version (the current) in a normal file - good for thumbnailing and editing with external apps like Gimp | ||
*If user edits some exotic format or unsupported RAW, or if he edits a read-only file on a read-only device, ask him, where to store the changed file | *If user edits some exotic format or unsupported RAW, or if he edits a read-only file on a read-only device, ask him, where to store the changed file | ||
*Create some small wrapper classes to read/write that format | *Create some small wrapper classes to read/write that format | ||
*mck182 - I would store changes like cropping immediately into new file as recropping image everytime it's displayed could be quite expensive | |||
=== 4. Naming scheme for versions of new (modified) images === | === 4. Naming scheme for versions of new (modified) images === | ||
Line 46: | Line 47: | ||
*New files will be put next to the original with just modified name | *New files will be put next to the original with just modified name | ||
*Names will be without spaces and not a translatable string if possible (because of possible non-ascii chars, which may cause problem on some other systems) | *Names will be without spaces and not a translatable string if possible (because of possible non-ascii chars, which may cause problem on some other systems) | ||
*For example image01.jpg (original), image01'''_v1'''.jpg (first version), image01'''_v2'''.jpg (second version) and so on | *For example image01.jpg (original), image01'''_v1'''.jpg (first version), image01'''_v2'''.jpg (second version) and so on | ||
*mck182 - When exactly will be the new files created? With every new modification to the original image (new modification of the original=new version)? I would let the first modification stay just in metadata, another new modification of the original would create _v1 file for the first modifications and the new modifications would go into original image's metadata. With another modification to the original image, dump the current modifications in metadata to _v2 file and write the new ones in metadata of the original etc etc. But that way we would also need something like _curr (current) version of the file for thumbnailing and working with other apps. | |||
== TODO == | |||
*specify details of the format for storing changes | |||
*think more about the UI changes (would be great to involve usability team) | |||
*email Krita mailing-list for their opinion? |
Revision as of 18:05, 6 March 2010
"Never touch the original"
Parts needed in the foundation:
- The format to store changes
- Adapting digiKam's plugins and filters
- Storing change information in image metadata and internal database
- Naming scheme for versions of new (modified) images
Parts needed in the UI:
- No more Save/Save As in the image editor, automatically save as new version
- Some sort of menu to choose the image version - original, modified, modified_2 etc.
- Menu/button for exporting the modified image
- Stacks of images (original/current version) in the album icon view --needs some thinking
- Widget to display version history - a tree view with buttons to show information would be nice
Details of foundation parts
1. The format to store changes
- Basically XML file in image metadata (using XMP)
- Use OpenRaster specification as a basepoint for changes description - http://create.freedesktop.org/wiki/OpenRaster
2. Adapting digiKam's plugins and filters
- We need to have an interface in EditorTool to get the serialized operation that has been applied
- From an image plugin, we need a list of filter names that are supported, and a way to execute a described operation on a given image
- Plugins will have to have unique name composed of filter name and some unique part (as there can be two plugins with same name) and also plugin version will be stored (as newer versions can have different parameters)
- Naming like < ... name="digikam:charcoal-hbr9Gh" version="2" > with version stored as another parameter for better parsing
3. Storing change information in image metadata and internal database
- Use XMP - defining a custom namespace and writing our changes
- Use OpenRaster specification as a basepoint for changes description - http://create.freedesktop.org/wiki/OpenRaster
- Always store the latest version (the current) in a normal file - good for thumbnailing and editing with external apps like Gimp
- If user edits some exotic format or unsupported RAW, or if he edits a read-only file on a read-only device, ask him, where to store the changed file
- Create some small wrapper classes to read/write that format
- mck182 - I would store changes like cropping immediately into new file as recropping image everytime it's displayed could be quite expensive
4. Naming scheme for versions of new (modified) images
- New files will be put next to the original with just modified name
- Names will be without spaces and not a translatable string if possible (because of possible non-ascii chars, which may cause problem on some other systems)
- For example image01.jpg (original), image01_v1.jpg (first version), image01_v2.jpg (second version) and so on
- mck182 - When exactly will be the new files created? With every new modification to the original image (new modification of the original=new version)? I would let the first modification stay just in metadata, another new modification of the original would create _v1 file for the first modifications and the new modifications would go into original image's metadata. With another modification to the original image, dump the current modifications in metadata to _v2 file and write the new ones in metadata of the original etc etc. But that way we would also need something like _curr (current) version of the file for thumbnailing and working with other apps.
TODO
- specify details of the format for storing changes
- think more about the UI changes (would be great to involve usability team)
- email Krita mailing-list for their opinion?