KDE PIM/Meetings/Osnabrueck 10: Difference between revisions
Line 262: | Line 262: | ||
Basically, there are two issues: | Basically, there are two issues: | ||
*Akonadi is perceived to be useless | |||
*Akonadi is perceived to be unstable, buggy, slow | |||
Both can be addressed by some decent articles and improvements to the website(s). The recent 'what did we fix in KMail' was great way of addressing the second point and we need to start writing about concrete examples of what will be possible (and esp about what is already done) asap to address the first issue. | Both can be addressed by some decent articles and improvements to the website(s). The recent 'what did we fix in KMail' was great way of addressing the second point and we need to start writing about concrete examples of what will be possible (and esp about what is already done) asap to address the first issue. |
Revision as of 20:00, 1 January 2012
The annual KDE PIM Meeting Osnabrück 10 is currently in a planning state. Intevation offices in Osnabrück are offered again as a location. Participation is open please enter yourself in the table below if you want to take part and set a marker on the weekends that would work for you.
Planning of a Date should be done around the end of the year.
For local questions about arrival feel free to contact [email protected]
Accomodation and Travel we will organize once we have a clear date
Date Finding Table
Legend:
X: available
- (or empty): not available
?: available but troublesome
Name | 6.-8.1 | 13.-15.1 | 20.-22.1 | 27.-29.1 | 10.-12.2 | 17.-19.2 | 24.-26.2 | 3.-4.3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Andre Heinecke | ? | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Georg Greve | ? | - | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Björn Ricks | ? | X | X | X | X | - | X | X |
Sérgio Martins | ?? | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Christian Mollekopf | - | - | - | - | X | X | X | X |
Kevin Ottens | - | X | X | - | X | X | X | - |
Bernhard Reiter | X | X | X | X | X | ? | ?? | X |
Guy Maurel | - | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
ThorstenStaerk | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Christoph Wickert | X | - | X | X | X | - | X | X |
David Jarvie | - | - | - | X | X | X | - | X |
Till Adam | - | - | X | - | X | X | X | X |
David Faure | X | X | - | X | X | X | X | X |
Volker Krause | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Thomas McGuire | - | - | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Cornelius Schumacher | X | ? | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Andras Mantia | ? | X | X | X | X | X | - | - |
Stephen Kelly | - | X | - | - | X | - | X | X |
Torgny Nyblom | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Camila Ayres | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Jos Poortvliet | X | X | X | X | X | X | ? | X |
Jeroen van Meeuwen | - | - | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Topics
Misc
- Nepomuk integration in KMail (and possibly other PIM applications) in respect to the feeder rewrite.
- Groupwise calendar resource for Akonadi
- Akonadi importer for Polka
Marketing
Akonadi and as a consequence KMail and the other PIM applications still have a pretty bad reputation. People perceive it as slow, using too much memory, or generally unstable. We should identify what are real problems and what is myth and come up with a plan how to address both.
Basically, there are two issues:
- Akonadi is perceived to be useless
- Akonadi is perceived to be unstable, buggy, slow
Both can be addressed by some decent articles and improvements to the website(s). The recent 'what did we fix in KMail' was great way of addressing the second point and we need to start writing about concrete examples of what will be possible (and esp about what is already done) asap to address the first issue.
Server Side Akonadi
See http://wiki.kolab.org/User:Greve/ServerSideAkonadi
KDE PIM on Mobile
How is Kontact and other parts of KDE PIM doing on the N9, on Android, on other mobile platforms?
Agenda
Friday
Arrival and start to meet and work