KDE Core/Platform 11/Settings: Difference between revisions
OpenIDUser14 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Problems could be: | Problems could be: | ||
There is no win/mac support. This requires keeping the old way with ini files a live or some investment to make dconf work or write other kconfig backends. | There is no win/mac support. This requires keeping the old way with ini files a live or some investment to make dconf work or write other kconfig backends. | ||
We can't use change notifications as that would assume use of dconf as a backend which makes an application unportable to windows/mac (currently). | |||
DConf stores its config in xdg dirs (.config). | DConf stores its config in xdg dirs (.config). | ||
Revision as of 18:14, 3 June 2011
Configuration systems
DConf
DConf as a backend for KConfig would offer some nice features. Helio wants to try to implement it.
Unlike the current .ini files it creates one or multiple binary settings files that is used by all applications. A shell tool exists as well as a gtk settings editor. This multiple files can be used in a form of list, with the benefits of locks as well, making a must for kiosk or at least not breaking the functionality.
Reading of settings is done via one mmaped file (read only). Therefor reading is fast. Writing happens via dbus.
There are notifications for changes of settings.
It features a hierarchy of settings like KConfig where user settings take precedence compared to system settings. The concept of locking is very similar to Kiosk immutable settings. In addition there are notifications if the locked state changes - that means activating a Kiosk immutable on a setting could immediately reflected in the UI.
There is an existing Qt library: https://gitorious.org/dconf-qt/dconf-qt
See also: http://live.gnome.org/dconf/SystemAdministrators
Problems could be:
There is no win/mac support. This requires keeping the old way with ini files a live or some investment to make dconf work or write other kconfig backends.
We can't use change notifications as that would assume use of dconf as a backend which makes an application unportable to windows/mac (currently).
DConf stores its config in xdg dirs (.config).
QDesktopServices
It may make sense to split between application state and actual configuration settings. DConf could then handle the real settings whereas application state (unread mails in kmail) could be handled by the traditional ini files.
Current state to compile
Core dconf It requires quite new version of glib and vala, the visual registry editor requires Gtk 3 ( not needed for us now ) and dconf-qt made by Canonical requires a new vendor patch for Qt, included only in Qt 4.8
General
Having a dconf backend to KConfig is nice but doesn't mean a huge change. For application developers nothing would change due to this.
What about QSettings? big problems with settings-groups, not power full enough for KDE. Can KConfig be merged with this?