Akademy/Handbook/Program committee: Difference between revisions
How the Programming Committee will evaluate talks submissions for 2024 |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Needs == | == Needs == | ||
* 5 | * 5 people for the program committee | ||
* program committee facilitator to move the process along and support the committee in putting together the schedule | * program committee facilitator to move the process along and support the committee in putting together the schedule | ||
Revision as of 10:36, 3 April 2024
Goal
We want an interesting, inspiring and useful program for Akademy. The program committee is tasked with putting the program together.
Needs
- 5 people for the program committee
- program committee facilitator to move the process along and support the committee in putting together the schedule
Talks Evaluation Criteria (2024)
Relevance to KDE
- Is this talk related to KDE work or something more generic/external?
Interest to KDE
- On internal projects, weigh "importance" to KDE, e.g. rating a talk regarding porting Frameworks to Qt6 higher than a random plasma widget.
- If an external topic is in question, is this something that our community would be interested in?
Speaker
- Are they known? Do they have interesting insights to share? Can they give a good talk?
- Does our potential lineup reflect the diversity of the KDE community?
Topic
- If we have submissions on similar topics, there's an option to suggest a merge of talks (and we can ask submitters to work together on one or do a panel)
- If there are many submissions on the same topic, try to solicit talks on different topics or focus (i.e. if there's a lot of technical talks, solicit some related to organizing/planning/achievements).
Additional info
- -