GSoC/2017/StatusReports/shazaismailkaoud: Difference between revisions
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
While developing the brush the user experience of the proposed design appeared to be not optimal, after several iteration during the program the user only has to set the source by the spot and click a button to fix it and by clicking anywhere in the image the destination is considered. The current brush supports motion which makes the tool easy to use. | While developing the brush the user experience of the proposed design appeared to be not optimal, after several iteration during the program the user only has to set the source by the spot and click a button to fix it and by clicking anywhere in the image the destination is considered. The current brush supports motion which makes the tool easy to use. | ||
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyGM4X3Z-Zs&feature=youtu.be demo video] | [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyGM4X3Z-Zs&feature=youtu.be demo video] | ||
== My Important links == | == My Important links == | ||
Revision as of 19:28, 28 August 2017
[digiKam]: Healing clone tool for dust spots removal
A tool for image editor to be used for healing image stains with the use of another part of the image by coloring by the use of one part over the other, mainly testing on dust spots, but can be used for other particles hiding as well.
Proposal: [1]
Screenshot: File:Healing clone.jpg
Produced Tool Demo
While developing the brush the user experience of the proposed design appeared to be not optimal, after several iteration during the program the user only has to set the source by the spot and click a button to fix it and by clicking anywhere in the image the destination is considered. The current brush supports motion which makes the tool easy to use. demo video