Jump to content

KDE Core/Platform 11/PlatformVsFrameworks: Difference between revisions

From KDE Community Wiki
Sebas (talk | contribs)
more
Sebas (talk | contribs)
more structure, bits
Line 25: Line 25:
The list below indicates our _intended_ situation.
The list below indicates our _intended_ situation.


== Frameworks ==
=== Frameworks which need changes ===
* kdecore  
* kdecore  
** auth 1)
** auth 1)
Line 35: Line 37:
** kaboutdata 7)
** kaboutdata 7)
** sonnet 9)
** sonnet 9)
=== Frameworks which look fine ===
* kdecore
** kshareddatacache
* kate
* dnssd
== Platform ==
== Trash ==
* kdecore/text
== Don't know / undecided ==
* kdecore/util
* kfile

Revision as of 21:38, 2 June 2011

Definition of Frameworks and Platformm

In our communication we want to use Frameworks, since this communicates the modularity of our libraries better than the term "platform", which gives a more monolithic, either-or impression.

Framework

  • Useful as separate library
  • platform independent

Platform

What needs work here?

The following list gives an idea of some problems we see with splitting up our frameworks:

  • 1) needs sycoca
  • 2) uses mimetype/xdg
  • 3) uses kded
  • 4) kglobal used, but only for ref/deref (which can maybe move into Qt)
  • 5) uses kglobal (in a non-trivial way)
  • 6) uses kaboutdata
  • 7) should be optional
  • 8) duplicates functionality in Qt
  • 9) should move into its own library

Framework or Platform in kdelibs

The list below indicates our _intended_ situation.

Frameworks

Frameworks which need changes

  • kdecore
    • auth 1)
    • compression 2)
    • kconfig 1), 8)
    • date 3), 8)
    • io 2), 5)
    • jobs 4)
    • kernel - needs splitting up and further investigation
    • kaboutdata 7)
    • sonnet 9)

Frameworks which look fine

  • kdecore
    • kshareddatacache
  • kate
  • dnssd

Platform

Trash

  • kdecore/text

Don't know / undecided

  • kdecore/util
  • kfile