Jump to content

KDE Documentation/Meetings/Akademy 2010 BoF: Difference between revisions

From KDE Community Wiki
Frederik (talk | contribs)
Annew (talk | contribs)
added more userbase info
 
Line 41: Line 41:




why not wiki to html/pdf directly
why not wiki to html/pdf directly - looks possible.  xml directly in api, pdf export extension available - needs testing




Line 49: Line 49:
formats: gnome
formats: gnome


offline docs
offline docs - method being investigated - some work already done on ocs may help.


Annew:
Annew:
* people needed to do the incredibly boring stuff regularily - eg fix tamplates
* people needed to do the incredibly boring stuff regularily - eg update images, or typographic editing - small bites at a time


blog on planetkde about userbase manual writing
blog on planetkde about userbase manual writing - needs very clear step-by-step instruction to get consistency.  (currently being written)


classroom
classroom

Latest revision as of 19:11, 8 July 2010

Akademy 2010 BoF

See BoF schedule for date and time.

Agenda

  • Status of documentation (content, tools, community, ...)
  • Role of Wikis and forum in KDE documentation
  • Status of KHelpcenter
  • Brainstorming about future of KDE documentation
  • Planning for KDE documentation sprint

Input

Thread on kde-doc-english with lots of good input

IRC channel: #kde-docs on freenode Mailing list: [email protected]

BoF Notes

(notes by Frederik, please extend)

Doc english as mailing list: not the perfect list name

quality of documentation

  • list on techbase
  • quality of documentation - Albert says there is a page about it, status is good, but translations lacking [1]

what's this help, tooltips

  • tooltips too large: on small screen it covers too much, what's this would be better here
  • should what's this be in tooltips?

userbase documentation

  • parley manual as guinea pig
  • page size, images, links, semantics
  • versioning of manuals
  • file uploading
  • translation of screenshots - mass uploads being worked on

do we need/have a native editor for wikis?


why not wiki to html/pdf directly - looks possible. xml directly in api, pdf export extension available - needs testing


specify what should be in manuals (eg not "how to compile")

formats: gnome

offline docs - method being investigated - some work already done on ocs may help.

Annew:

  • people needed to do the incredibly boring stuff regularily - eg update images, or typographic editing - small bites at a time

blog on planetkde about userbase manual writing - needs very clear step-by-step instruction to get consistency. (currently being written)

classroom