Jump to content

KDE Core/KCalendarSystem: Difference between revisions

From KDE Community Wiki
Jlayt (talk | contribs)
Jlayt (talk | contribs)
 
Line 24: Line 24:


Astronomical Calendars are being implemented in a GSoC project, see the [[KDE_Core/Astronomical_Calendars|project page]] for details.
Astronomical Calendars are being implemented in a GSoC project, see the [[KDE_Core/Astronomical_Calendars|project page]] for details.
http://community.kde.org/


== Calendar Systems in Qt5 ==
== Calendar Systems in Qt5 ==

Latest revision as of 14:51, 7 August 2011

KCalendarSystem

KCalendarSystem was created in KDE2 as QDateTime does not provide calendar system localisation, and still doesn't in Qt4. It is hoped in Qt5 to merge the KDE code into QDateTime so KDE no longer has to provide separate date/time functions.

KCalendarSystem was originally a virtual base class providing common implementations for many functions. Specific calendars could derive from the class and override the base functions where required. The Private class (d-ptr) was only used for some common utility functions and data. This arrangement was good as it allowed 3rd parties to derive their own calendar class. Unfortunately a mistake in the 4.0 release meant no extra virtual slots were reserved for the base class and binary compatibility rules prevent new virtual slots from being added to the virtual table. Instead a virtual Private class had to be implemented with the calendar specific overloads for any new functions now being in the d-ptr instead of the derived classes. This unfortunately prevents any external calendar implementations, but this will be fixed up in KDE5.

All the calendar implementations, such as KCalendarSystemGregorian are private classes, the api only ever exposes the common base class api and apps only ever use the KClaendarSystem class. Instead a static factory function returns the correct derived implementation when requested. While this is good for ensuring apps never have to think about what calendar they are using or what class to use, it restricts us from directly having any functions in a calendar that are not common to all calendars. A way around this when special variables are required for just one calendar is to set the variables in the locale config file which the appropriate calendar will read and use, but these features can never be directly manipulated via the api.

Standards

The POSIX standard does not define any alternative calendar systems and POSIX implementations only work with Gregorian. For example, all the Linux/Unix command line commands and Gnome only support Gregorian as a result.

The Unicode CLDR standard defines support for alternative calendar systems and defines names (some inaccurately) for supported calendar systems, but does not actually define how to calculate those calendars. The ICU implementation of Unicode CLDR does implement the Unicode defined calendar systems, but these are poorly documented and in some cases appear to be incorrect.

The iCalendar standard defines a variable to hold the calendar system type but has never actually defined any alternative calendars or how they should work.

Apple supports alternative calendar systems and appears to use the Unicode CLDR and ICU standard implementations including their inaccuracies.

Microsoft supports alternative calendar systems, initially using their own inaccurate implementations, but now apparently using the Unicode CLDR or ICU implementations.

Astronomical Calendars

Astronomical Calendars are being implemented in a GSoC project, see the project page for details.

Calendar Systems in Qt5

Calendar systems will be added to Qt5, please see the Qt and KDE pages on the subject.